Olympus E-M1X vs Sony T900
54 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Launched January 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-M1X vs Sony T900 Overview
The following is a thorough overview of the Olympus E-M1X and Sony T900, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and T900 (12MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M1X was revealed 10 years after the T900 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-M1X grades vs the T900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-M1X vs Sony T900 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1X & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1X Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Sony T900
| E-M1X | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2019 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 121 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 1037k |  | 922k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-M1X
| T900 | E-M1X | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Sony T900
| E-M1X | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1X enjoys physical dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) while the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1X and Sony T900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M1X and the T900.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1X and T900 is 54 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing specifications. The picture below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1X and T900.
To sum up, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1X with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1X will offer more detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more recent E-M1X is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-M1X vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2019-01-24 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Dual TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 997 gr (2.20 lbs) | 143 gr (0.32 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 870 photos | - |
| Battery type | Built-in | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | - | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 2 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $2,999 | $300 |