Clicky

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus E-P2

Portability
80
Imaging
53
Features
84
Overall
65
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front
 
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
  • Launched February 2015
  • Old Model is Olympus E-M5
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-M5 III
Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Launched April 2010
  • Superseded the Olympus E-P1
  • Successor is Olympus E-P3
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus E-P2 Overview

Here, we are reviewing the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus E-P2, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both produced by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and E-P2 (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (Four Thirds).

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-M5 II was manufactured 4 years after the E-P2 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-M5 II scores versus the E-P2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus E-P2

 E-M5 II E-P2 
LaunchedFebruary 2015April 2010More modern by 59 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k230kSharper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus E-M5 II

 E-P2 E-M5 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus E-P2

 E-M5 II E-P2 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Display size3"3"Same display measurement

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 II comes with physical measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") with a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Olympus E-P2 has specifications of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus E-P2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M5 II vs the E-P2.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus E-P2 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 II and E-P2 is 80 and 86 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus E-P2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching a spec sheet. The pic here might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 II and E-P2.

As you can see, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus E-M5 II to provide you with more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 II should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus E-P2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Portrait photography information
Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography information
71
manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
60
you can focus manually
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
low MP (12MP)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M5 II
Street photography with Olympus E-P2
82
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
offers focus via touch
weather proof
very good ISO range (25,600)
74
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
fixed screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-P2 as a Sports photography camera
65
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
weather proof
bad battery (310 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
slow fps (3.0 frames/s)
low MP (12MP)
low battery pack (300 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-P2 as a Travel photography camera
74
weather proof
offers focus via touch
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
bad battery (310 CIPA)
43
missing Time Lapse function
low battery pack (300 shots)
low MP (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Landscape photography factors
Olympus E-P2 Landscape photography factors
74
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
weather proof
bad battery (310 CIPA)
60
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
low MP (12MP)
low battery pack (300 shots)
missing Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Vlogging details
Olympus E-P2 Vlogging details
82
selfie friendly screen
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
includes external mic port
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detect autofocus
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus E-P2
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IIOlympus PEN E-P2
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Olympus PEN E-P2
Type Advanced Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2015-02-06 2010-04-22
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VII TruePic V
Sensor type MOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4032 x 3024
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW photos
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 81 11
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 107 107
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology - HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Max silent shutter speed 1/16000 seconds -
Continuous shutter speed 10.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250 seconds 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 469 grams (1.03 lbs) 355 grams (0.78 lbs)
Physical dimensions 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 73 56
DXO Color Depth score 23.0 21.5
DXO Dynamic range score 12.4 10.4
DXO Low light score 896 505
Other
Battery life 310 photographs 300 photographs
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLN-1 BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $699 $799