Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-820UZ
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87f98/87f9860bdd2f90e1ac1160944f3da7fb05966ce6" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e0d4/0e0d4aacb66b19b548b702bfe965d618cb352c1d" alt="Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ front Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ front"
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-820UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Announced February 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M5
- Updated by Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Revealed August 2012
- Succeeded the Olympus SP-820UZ
- Replacement is Olympus SP-820UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-820UZ Overview
Here is a thorough review of the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-820UZ, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are created by Olympus. The resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the SP-820UZ (14MP) is pretty similar but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and SP-820UZ (1/2.3") use totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M5 II was unveiled 2 years later than the SP-820UZ and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-820UZ being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-M5 II grades vs the SP-820UZ in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II and Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery and Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus SP-820UZ
E-M5 II | SP-820UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | ![]() | August 2012 | Fresher by 30 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Olympus E-M5 II
SP-820UZ | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus SP-820UZ
E-M5 II | SP-820UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-820UZ Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 II offers exterior measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-820UZ has proportions of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") and a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-820UZ in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M5 II against the SP-820UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b9b0/8b9b01e410080a6ebc81087054b23db748dc848e" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-820UZ size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-820UZ size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and SP-820UZ is 80 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b189/0b189431edad3146eaf8cd81dd30152d0ddfc6cd" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-820UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-820UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-820UZ Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The visual below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 II and SP-820UZ.
As you have seen, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 II with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M5 II will deliver greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 II is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7eaf/f7eafe5947f861e72f10d59af78d611768714cd3" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-820UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-820UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1228/b1228500d9455b36ca4ec01667a9411b2f504cb8" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-820UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2015-02-06 | 2012-08-21 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 22-896mm (40.7x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.4-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 15.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 469 grams (1.03 pounds) | 485 grams (1.07 pounds) |
Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $699 | $299 |