Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus Tough-3000
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87f98/87f9860bdd2f90e1ac1160944f3da7fb05966ce6" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5
- Successor is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M5 II was introduced 5 years later than the Tough-3000 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-M5 II grades versus the Tough-3000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus Tough-3000
E-M5 II | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 62 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-M5 II
Tough-3000 | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus Tough-3000
E-M5 II | Tough-3000 |
---|
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 II features outer measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") having a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the E-M5 II against the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a665/0a665f99722b22609232b45d3dc440ab364b9c96" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 II and Tough-3000 is 80 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b513c/b513c736f171b1d4c829198773048780be71be20" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 II and Tough-3000.
Clearly, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 II having a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M5 II will give you more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The younger E-M5 II should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfed6/dfed6a9cccadad319fee12d62ea543ce8d4febcc" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3746b/3746b8d407b49cfc278ea0386cb4f3dc04e92da3" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Alternate name | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2015-02-06 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 2cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 469g (1.03 pounds) | 159g (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $699 | $0 |