Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 8000
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87f98/87f9860bdd2f90e1ac1160944f3da7fb05966ce6" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e541/6e541f13ef88ea0ca8eaf6180c7a6a686d0521cf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M5
- Successor is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 8000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 8000 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-M5 II versus Olympus 8000, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are offered by Olympus. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and 8000 (12MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and 8000 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M5 II was launched 5 years after the 8000 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-M5 II scores vs the 8000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus 8000
E-M5 II | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 69 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Olympus E-M5 II
8000 | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus 8000
E-M5 II | 8000 |
---|
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 II enjoys outside dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") and a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) and the Olympus 8000 has measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M5 II versus Olympus 8000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the E-M5 II compared to the 8000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/921fc/921fc401c500280af672d97f4a08288d707ebfab" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 8000 size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 8000 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and 8000 is 80 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81fbb/81fbbb8f9c20c432ceb7219ba2dbffb7feeb1176" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 8000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 8000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specifications. The pic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 II and 8000.
To sum up, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 II because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 II will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 II should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1514/a151401f084ae8e5814ee1953229b8f815e0c4f5" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 8000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 8000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d20c5/d20c5c71a737992624ec9f86f8410747c8684920" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
Also called | - | mju Tough 8000 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2015-02-06 | 2009-07-01 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | - | 2cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 1/4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 469 grams (1.03 lbs) | 182 grams (0.40 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $699 | $380 |