Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-10
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Old Model is Olympus E-M5
- Renewed by Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Announced January 2013
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Here is a complete review of the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus XZ-10, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and XZ-10 (12MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and XZ-10 (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M5 II was brought out 2 years later than the XZ-10 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-M5 II scores against the XZ-10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II and Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery and Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus XZ-10
E-M5 II | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | January 2013 | Fresher by 25 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Crisper screen (+117k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus E-M5 II
XZ-10 | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus XZ-10
E-M5 II | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 II has exterior measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") having a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-10 has proportions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus XZ-10 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M5 II vs the XZ-10.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and XZ-10 is 80 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing purely by looking at specs. The photograph here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 II and XZ-10.
All in all, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 II because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M5 II will give you greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 II should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2015-02-06 | 2013-01-30 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 469 grams (1.03 pounds) | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | 240 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $699 | $428 |