Clicky

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-10

Portability
80
Imaging
54
Features
84
Overall
66
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front
 
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front
Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
57
Overall
44

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
  • Revealed February 2015
  • Old Model is Olympus E-M5
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M5 III
Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
  • 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
  • Announced January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview

Here is a complete review of the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus XZ-10, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and XZ-10 (12MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and XZ-10 (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M5 II was brought out 2 years later than the XZ-10 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-M5 II scores against the XZ-10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus XZ-10

 E-M5 II XZ-10 
AnnouncedFebruary 2015January 2013Fresher by 25 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k920kCrisper screen (+117k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus E-M5 II

 XZ-10 E-M5 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus XZ-10

 E-M5 II XZ-10 
Manual focus Very accurate focusing
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry your camera, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 II has exterior measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") having a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-10 has proportions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus XZ-10 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M5 II vs the XZ-10.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and XZ-10 is 80 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing purely by looking at specs. The photograph here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 II and XZ-10.

All in all, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 II because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M5 II will give you greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 II should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Portrait photography factors
Olympus XZ-10 Portrait photography factors
72
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
45
manual focus
supports face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Street photography advice
Olympus XZ-10 Street photography advice
82
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
offers touch focus
environment sealing
good high ISO (25,600)
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
heavier than competition (221g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Sports photography advice
Olympus XZ-10 Sports photography advice
65
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent shutter (1/16,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
environment sealing
bad battery pack (310 shots)
lack of phase detect autofocus
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking focus
max fps very slow (5.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Travel photography features
Olympus XZ-10 Travel photography features
74
environment sealing
offers touch focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
bad battery pack (310 shots)
60
built-in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
no Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (221 grams)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Landscape photography information
Olympus XZ-10 Landscape photography information
74
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
environment sealing
bad battery pack (310 shots)
53
manual focus
reasonably wide (26mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Vlogging highlights
Olympus XZ-10 Vlogging highlights
82
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
includes mic jack
35
reasonably wide (26mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no mic support
heavier than competition (221g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus XZ-10
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IIOlympus Stylus XZ-10
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Olympus Stylus XZ-10
Category Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2015-02-06 2013-01-30
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VII -
Sensor type MOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW format
Lowest enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 81 35
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/1.8-2.7
Macro focus range - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shutter rate 10.0 frames per second 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash -
Flash settings Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 469 grams (1.03 pounds) 221 grams (0.49 pounds)
Physical dimensions 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 896 not tested
Other
Battery life 310 pictures 240 pictures
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLN-1 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $699 $428