Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87f98/87f9860bdd2f90e1ac1160944f3da7fb05966ce6" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M5
- Later Model is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-M5 II versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M5 II was revealed 3 years later than the TG-820 iHS and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-M5 II matches up versus the TG-820 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-M5 II | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | ![]() | February 2012 | Fresher by 37 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 1030k | Sharper screen (+7k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-M5 II
TG-820 iHS | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-M5 II | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 II provides exterior measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") with a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has specifications of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M5 II versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M5 II vs the TG-820 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c59b/4c59bd135d99b7e2863911499992a1a6a8059f2e" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and TG-820 iHS is 80 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/349b3/349b3954fc5a4c0864d9d2a12729de7f11d66f9a" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by checking out specifications. The graphic below might offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 II and TG-820 iHS.
To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 II with its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M5 II will show more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 II is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd894/cd894c00b524eb758360cba89a164ea71949c565" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc2cd/dc2cdad56490a73fdd18d4335711953c728f2f8f" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2015-02-06 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,030 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 469 grams (1.03 pounds) | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | 220 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $699 | $500 |