Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Released February 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5
- Later Model is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Launched January 2013
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M5 II versus Olympus TG-830 iHS, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both created by Olympus. The resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the TG-830 iHS (16MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M5 II was released 2 years after the TG-830 iHS which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-M5 II scores against the TG-830 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II and Olympus TG-830 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery and Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-M5 II | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | January 2013 | Newer by 26 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Sharper screen (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus E-M5 II
TG-830 iHS | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-M5 II | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 II provides outer dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) and the Olympus TG-830 iHS has proportions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M5 II versus Olympus TG-830 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M5 II vs the TG-830 iHS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and TG-830 iHS is 80 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions purely by going through technical specs. The picture underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 II and TG-830 iHS.
As you have seen, each of the cameras posses the exact same resolution albeit different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 II has got the bigger sensor which should make achieving shallower DOF simpler. The fresher E-M5 II should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2015-02-06 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 469 grams (1.03 lb) | 214 grams (0.47 lb) |
Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | 300 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $699 | $0 |