Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M5
- Successor is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus TG-1 iHS, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M5 II was manufactured 2 years later than the TG-1 iHS and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-M5 II grades vs the TG-1 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-M5 II | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2015 | May 2012 | More recent by 34 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 610k | Crisper screen (+427k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus E-M5 II
TG-1 iHS | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-M5 II | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 II has outside dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") along with a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Olympus TG-1 iHS has specifications of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus TG-1 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M5 II compared to the TG-1 iHS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 II and TG-1 iHS is 80 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements simply by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 II and TG-1 iHS.
As you can see, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 II due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 II will result in more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The newer E-M5 II should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2015-02-06 | 2012-05-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 469 gr (1.03 lbs) | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 shots | 350 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | LI90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $699 | $399 |