Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-4
Portability
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
Portability
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Released February 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5
- Later Model is Olympus E-M5 III
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced April 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
- New Model is Olympus TG-5
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M5 II versus Olympus TG-4, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both built by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the TG-4 (16MP) is pretty similar but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and TG-4 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M5 II was manufactured 2 months earlier than the TG-4 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-M5 II scores versus the TG-4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II and Olympus Tough TG-4. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus TG-4
| E-M5 II | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus E-M5 II
| TG-4 | E-M5 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus TG-4
| E-M5 II | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2015 |  | April 2015 | Similar generation |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 II comes with external dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) and the Olympus TG-4 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M5 II versus Olympus TG-4 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M5 II versus the TG-4.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and TG-4 is 80 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading technical specs. The pic here will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 II and TG-4.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras posses the exact same MP albeit different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 II includes the bigger sensor which is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-4 as a Portrait photography camera
manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
manual focus
good MP (16MP)
comes with face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II Street photography information
Olympus TG-4 Street photography information
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
features touch focus
weather proof
above average ISO range (25,600)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
environment proofing
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition (247g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II Sports photography highlights
Olympus TG-4 Sports photography highlights
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet mode (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
weather proof
terrible battery life (310 per charge)
has no phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
environment proofing
better than average battery life (380 CIPA)
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II Travel photography highlights
Olympus TG-4 Travel photography highlights
weather proof
features touch focus
good MP (16MP)
selfie friendly display
terrible battery life (310 shots)
better than average battery life (380 CIPA)
environment proofing
good MP (16MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competition (247g)
display is not selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II Landscape photography info
Olympus TG-4 Landscape photography info
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
weather proof
terrible battery life (310 per charge)
manual focus
decently wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
delivers RAW formats
environment proofing
better than average battery life (380 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-4 as a Vlogging camera
selfie friendly display
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
comes with mic socket
decently wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have microphone jack
more heavy than competition (247 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Released | 2015-02-06 | 2015-04-13 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 81 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 469 gr (1.03 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 896 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 photographs | 380 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLN-1 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $699 | $379 |