Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH3
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87f98/87f9860bdd2f90e1ac1160944f3da7fb05966ce6" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98111/98111a0b7c2ad20df355c7415ff9f3db6009ee5f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M5
- Successor is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 165g - 98 x 55 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FS11
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH3 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus E-M5 II versus Panasonic FH3, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the FH3 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and FH3 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M5 II was introduced 5 years after the FH3 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FH3 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-M5 II scores versus the FH3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Panasonic FH3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Panasonic FH3
E-M5 II | FH3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 62 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH3 over the Olympus E-M5 II
FH3 | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Panasonic FH3
E-M5 II | FH3 |
---|
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH3 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 II features outer measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") and a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH3 has sizing of 98mm x 55mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M5 II versus Panasonic FH3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M5 II versus the FH3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51540/51540365519ff0c80a9d85fdc141bbec6f3243d5" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH3 size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH3 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 II and FH3 is 80 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3704/d3704998b9bd3bc8c9bf0764e6b4c33fbf17068b" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes merely by seeing specifications. The image here will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 II and FH3.
Plainly, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 II using its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M5 II will provide extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M5 II will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5609b/5609bda40a19dd37406f1139753b400eb6c0f868" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50b76/50b7607c5573a6a761767fc3f3e0b2d0e617046a" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FH3 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FS11 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2015-02-06 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 469g (1.03 lbs) | 165g (0.36 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 98 x 55 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $699 | $160 |