Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS42
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M5
- Successor is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Expand to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Released April 2009
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-M5 II and Panasonic FS42, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and FS42 (1/2.5") offer different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M5 II was revealed 5 years later than the FS42 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-M5 II grades versus the FS42 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery and Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Panasonic FS42
E-M5 II | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | April 2009 | Fresher by 71 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus E-M5 II
FS42 | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Panasonic FS42
E-M5 II | FS42 |
---|
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 II enjoys exterior measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS42 has proportions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M5 II and Panasonic FS42 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M5 II compared to the FS42.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 II and FS42 is 80 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through technical specs. The visual below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 II and FS42.
As you can tell, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 II with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M5 II will provide you with more detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 II provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2015-02-06 | 2009-04-17 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1000 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.5" |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 469 grams (1.03 lb) | 132 grams (0.29 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $699 | $580 |