Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ1000
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87f98/87f9860bdd2f90e1ac1160944f3da7fb05966ce6" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a092/2a092ddc3a33aceaaaea152b15c17049a1980cec" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 front"
55 Imaging
51 Features
80 Overall
62
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Launched February 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M5
- Updated by Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Announced June 2014
- Newer Model is Panasonic FZ2500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ1000, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the FZ1000 (20MP) is pretty close but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and FZ1000 (1") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M5 II was announced 8 months after the FZ1000 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-M5 II matches up versus the FZ1000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Panasonic FZ1000
E-M5 II | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | ![]() | June 2014 | More modern by 8 months |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 921k | Crisper screen (+116k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus E-M5 II
FZ1000 | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Panasonic FZ1000
E-M5 II | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 II provides physical dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") along with a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ1000 has measurements of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") along with a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view scale comparison of the E-M5 II vs the FZ1000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd6e5/cd6e52c8c0d2ce4fd6064f5ffb10657074ad99c7" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and FZ1000 is 80 and 55 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7558/c75580226465092dd6053b2ca68170e45f5e432f" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes merely by researching a spec sheet. The pic underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 II and FZ1000.
Clearly, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 II using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Panasonic FZ1000 will render extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more modern E-M5 II is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6eae4/6eae4bccbee7cd938796851262de16684fb671ac" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9902/a9902245db683dcf1411681a072da17aa2d2ad68" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2015-02-06 | 2014-06-12 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 469 grams (1.03 lb) | 831 grams (1.83 lb) |
Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | 896 | 517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photographs | 360 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $699 | $800 |