Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ200
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Launched February 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5
- Replacement is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Announced July 2012
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ100
- Later Model is Panasonic FZ300
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the Olympus E-M5 II versus Panasonic FZ200, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") use different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M5 II was announced 2 years later than the FZ200 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-M5 II matches up vs the FZ200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery and Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Panasonic FZ200
| E-M5 II | FZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2015 |  | July 2012 | More recent by 32 months |
| Display resolution | 1037k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+577k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-M5 II
| FZ200 | E-M5 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Panasonic FZ200
| E-M5 II | FZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Both are selfie friendly |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 II provides outer measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") along with a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ200 has specifications of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") accompanied by a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M5 II versus Panasonic FZ200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-M5 II vs the FZ200.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 II and FZ200 is 80 and 65 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching technical specs. The graphic here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 II and FZ200.
As you have seen, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 II having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 II will provide you with greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 II should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2015-02-06 | 2012-07-18 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | Venus Engine VII FHD |
| Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 81 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 1,312k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 13.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250s | 1/4000s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 469 gr (1.03 lbs) | 588 gr (1.30 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 73 | 37 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | 19.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | 896 | 114 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 shots | 540 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $699 | $499 |