Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ40
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87f98/87f9860bdd2f90e1ac1160944f3da7fb05966ce6" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8885a/8885a4e93f33c4e3d4295612c95591b63ab3d9ae" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40 front"
68 Imaging
37 Features
40 Overall
38
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Launched February 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M5
- Later Model is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 494g - 120 x 80 x 92mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FZ45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus E-M5 II versus Panasonic FZ40, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the FZ40 (14MP) is very comparable but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and FZ40 (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M5 II was revealed 4 years after the FZ40 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ40 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-M5 II grades against the FZ40 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery and Panasonic FZ40 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Panasonic FZ40
E-M5 II | FZ40 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | ![]() | July 2010 | Newer by 56 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ40 over the Olympus E-M5 II
FZ40 | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Panasonic FZ40
E-M5 II | FZ40 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 II has outer measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") having a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ40 has specifications of 120mm x 80mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 3.6") with a weight of 494 grams (1.09 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M5 II versus Panasonic FZ40 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M5 II versus the FZ40.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/626e0/626e084a99c630c7ff3ab5000c6489f6df5d393d" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ40 size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ40 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and FZ40 is 80 and 68 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0daf7/0daf72a0d82c035e3229d431b460bea659f86f59" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ40 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ40 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions just by seeing a spec sheet. The picture here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 II and FZ40.
Clearly, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 II using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M5 II will provide greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 II should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c984a/c984a000ccecbb4235852b3a2cc64c2b1d727aba" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ40 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ40 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e86e8/e86e8cf62a689f534651b844c0a3a5ad98f0cb49" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ45 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2015-02-06 | 2010-07-21 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 9.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 469g (1.03 pounds) | 494g (1.09 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 120 x 80 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $699 | $420 |