Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZR1
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZR1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Released February 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M5
- Renewed by Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 158g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-ZX1
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZR1 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZR1, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and ZR1 (12MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and ZR1 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M5 II was manufactured 5 years after the ZR1 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZR1 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-M5 II grades vs the ZR1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZR1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Panasonic ZR1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Panasonic ZR1
E-M5 II | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | July 2009 | Newer by 68 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR1 over the Olympus E-M5 II
ZR1 | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Panasonic ZR1
E-M5 II | ZR1 |
---|
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZR1 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 II has outside measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") and a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZR1 has sizing of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZR1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M5 II against the ZR1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 II and ZR1 is 80 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZR1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by going over specs. The image below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 II and ZR1.
All in all, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 II featuring a bigger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M5 II will offer you more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots more aggressively. The younger E-M5 II is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZR1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 |
Other name | - | Lumix DMC-ZX1 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2015-02-06 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 469g (1.03 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $699 | $280 |