Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS70
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87f98/87f9860bdd2f90e1ac1160944f3da7fb05966ce6" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d82e5/d82e595cf12ba833a5fbbd1a5a87296032b240dd" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS70 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS70 front"
87 Imaging
46 Features
70 Overall
55
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Announced February 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M5
- New Model is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 322g - 112 x 67 x 41mm
- Introduced April 2017
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ90
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS60
- Successor is Panasonic ZS80
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS70 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS70, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the ZS70 (20MP) is fairly close but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and ZS70 (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M5 II was manufactured 3 years earlier than the ZS70 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS70 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-M5 II matches up versus the ZS70 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS70 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS70. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery and Panasonic ZS70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Panasonic ZS70
E-M5 II | ZS70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS70 over the Olympus E-M5 II
ZS70 | E-M5 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2017 | ![]() | February 2015 | More recent by 26 months |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1037k | Crisper display (+3k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Panasonic ZS70
E-M5 II | ZS70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS70 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 II comes with external dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS70 has specifications of 112mm x 67mm x 41mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 322 grams (0.71 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS70 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M5 II and the ZS70.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17bf8/17bf85aa8cdfe2cf6437f93f5863f38bcbd761c8" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS70 size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS70 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and ZS70 is 80 and 87 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cc74/3cc744762b96a4774bcf5c59c19cadb42eec3332" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS70 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS70 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS70 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by researching specifications. The visual underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 II and ZS70.
Plainly, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 II due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic ZS70 will result in extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older E-M5 II will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9b69/d9b6943069ceeb745e702536001fbfdcf77d5077" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS70 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS70 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS70 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8efff/8efff61084fef1e2aac6d3528e55eedfb97b5d05" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic ZS70 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS70 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ90 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2015-02-06 | 2017-04-19 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 1,166 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.60 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 469g (1.03 pounds) | 322g (0.71 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 112 x 67 x 41mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | 380 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 3 shots / 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $699 | $450 |