Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87f98/87f9860bdd2f90e1ac1160944f3da7fb05966ce6" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f030/9f03013b4b6e229689ea100f87aa37abcbac60f6" alt="Pentax Optio WG-1 front Pentax Optio WG-1 front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M5
- Updated by Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus E-M5 II and Pentax WG-1, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the WG-1 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and WG-1 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M5 II was brought out 4 years after the WG-1 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-M5 II scores versus the WG-1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Pentax Optio WG-1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Pentax WG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Pentax WG-1
E-M5 II | WG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | ![]() | February 2011 | Newer by 49 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 over the Olympus E-M5 II
WG-1 | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Pentax WG-1
E-M5 II | WG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 II features physical dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") having a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Pentax WG-1 has dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M5 II and Pentax WG-1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M5 II versus the WG-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48b97/48b97a279dbdc6e607c3e2fdd1f83bb8abbae8b7" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and WG-1 is 80 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d328a/d328a031fb0849ef5e450e171c405f796a2ad94f" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to envision the gap between sensor dimensions just by looking at specifications. The image below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 II and WG-1.
To sum up, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 II due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M5 II will resolve greater detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 II is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc4eb/dc4eb26fea754ccbb1e215ee282fe97011934135" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9e76/b9e76cf2f62635f810a4211f0060c9989c51bdc4" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax WG-1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Pentax Optio WG-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Pentax Optio WG-1 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2015-02-06 | 2011-02-07 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 469 gr (1.03 lb) | 157 gr (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 images | 260 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $699 | $350 |