Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax Q-S1
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Announced February 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5
- Later Model is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Introduced August 2014
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus E-M5 II versus Pentax Q-S1, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Pentax. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and Q-S1 (12MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and Q-S1 (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M5 II was released 7 months after the Q-S1 and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-M5 II grades vs the Q-S1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Pentax Q-S1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Pentax Q-S1
E-M5 II | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2015 | August 2014 | More modern by 7 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Clearer screen (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus E-M5 II
Q-S1 | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Pentax Q-S1
E-M5 II | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you should factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 II has outside dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") with a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q-S1 has specifications of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M5 II versus Pentax Q-S1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M5 II versus the Q-S1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 II and Q-S1 is 80 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes simply by checking specs. The picture underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 II and Q-S1.
All in all, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 II featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 II will give more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 II will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Pentax Q-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Pentax Q-S1 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2015-02-06 | 2014-08-04 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | Q Engine |
Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 8 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 469 grams (1.03 lbs) | 203 grams (0.45 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | 250 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $699 | $250 |