Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
85 Imaging
33 Features
48 Overall
39
Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Launched February 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M5
- New Model is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 367g - 114 x 58 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus E-M5 II versus Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (10MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M5 II was launched 4 years after the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-M5 II scores against the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
| E-M5 II | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 |  | August 2010 | Newer by 55 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 1037k |  | 920k | Crisper display (+117k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC over the Olympus E-M5 II
| GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | E-M5 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
| E-M5 II | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 II enjoys physical measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") along with a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 367 grams (0.81 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M5 II versus Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M5 II against the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC is 80 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading a spec sheet. The picture underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 II and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 II because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M5 II will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics more aggressively. The newer E-M5 II is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2015-02-06 | 2010-08-06 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 81 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 469 gr (1.03 lbs) | 367 gr (0.81 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 114 x 58 x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 896 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 photos | 440 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $699 | $147 |