Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung GX-10
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87f98/87f9860bdd2f90e1ac1160944f3da7fb05966ce6" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc7ea/dc7eae8dfcdf015ab3f3221abf91ebb5af0f0aea" alt="Samsung GX-10 front Samsung GX-10 front"
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Launched February 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M5
- Successor is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Released September 2006
- Replacement is Samsung GX-20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M5 II versus Samsung GX-10, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and GX-10 (10MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and GX-10 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M5 II was released 8 years after the GX-10 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-M5 II grades against the GX-10 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Samsung GX-10. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Samsung GX-10
E-M5 II | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | ![]() | September 2006 | Newer by 102 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 210k | Crisper display (+827k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Olympus E-M5 II
GX-10 | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Samsung GX-10
E-M5 II | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 II provides external measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") having a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-10 has sizing of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") with a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M5 II versus Samsung GX-10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the E-M5 II against the GX-10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54eb2/54eb217ad5cd01e0a4f8d32635a5a178ee143b34" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung GX-10 size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung GX-10 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 II and GX-10 is 80 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2f15/e2f15cbb1c8eedaa519e344f0bd77820e023e960" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung GX-10 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung GX-10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by going over a spec sheet. The pic below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 II and GX-10.
Clearly, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 II due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Olympus E-M5 II will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 II will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99d42/99d42385895d6f4ed3743588e941af764c996f4d" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung GX-10 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung GX-10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b46b/9b46be45963ed88ebf96d801739cb52b2380aab7" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Samsung GX-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Samsung GX-10 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2015-02-06 | 2006-09-21 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Available lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 210k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 469 grams (1.03 lb) | 793 grams (1.75 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $699 | $850 |