Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma Quattro
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Released February 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M5
- Later Model is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Below is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-M5 II versus Sigma Quattro, both Advanced Mirrorless cameras by rivals Olympus and Sigma. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and Quattro (APS-C) come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M5 II was revealed 12 months prior to the Quattro which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-M5 II scores vs the Quattro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Sigma sd Quattro. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Sigma Quattro
E-M5 II | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Olympus E-M5 II
Quattro | E-M5 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2016 | February 2015 | More recent by 12 months | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 1037k | Sharper screen (+583k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Sigma Quattro
E-M5 II | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 II features external measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M5 II versus Sigma Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M5 II versus the Quattro.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and Quattro is 80 and 63 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out technical specs. The visual underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 II and Quattro.
As you can tell, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 II with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sigma Quattro will show extra detail because of its extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older E-M5 II will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sigma sd Quattro |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2015-02-06 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 29 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sigma SA |
Available lenses | 107 | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 3.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 469 gr (1.03 lbs) | 625 gr (1.38 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $699 | $738 |