Clicky

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
80
Imaging
53
Features
84
Overall
65
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
  • Released February 2015
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M5
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M5 III
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Introduced February 2016
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma Quattro Overview

Below is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-M5 II versus Sigma Quattro, both Advanced Mirrorless cameras by rivals Olympus and Sigma. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and Quattro (APS-C) come with totally different sensor dimensions.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-M5 II was revealed 12 months prior to the Quattro which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-M5 II scores vs the Quattro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Sigma Quattro

 E-M5 II Quattro 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Olympus E-M5 II

 Quattro E-M5 II 
IntroducedFebruary 2016February 2015More recent by 12 months
Screen resolution1620k1037kSharper screen (+583k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Sigma Quattro

 E-M5 II Quattro 
Manually focus More accurate focus
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 II features external measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M5 II versus Sigma Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M5 II versus the Quattro.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and Quattro is 80 and 63 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out technical specs. The visual underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 II and Quattro.

As you can tell, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 II with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sigma Quattro will show extra detail because of its extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older E-M5 II will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M5 II
Portrait photography with Sigma Quattro
71
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
features face detection focus
supports RAW files
81
you can focus manually
amazing MP (29MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II as a Street photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Street photography camera
82
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
provides touch to focus
weather sealing
great ISO range (25,600)
59
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
environment proofing
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
heavier than competition (625g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M5 II
Sports photography with Sigma Quattro
65
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/16,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
weather sealing
terrible battery pack (310 per charge)
lack of phase detect auto focus
70
amazing MP (29MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
provides tracking focus
environment proofing
has phase detect AF
max fps low (3.8 frames per second)
no image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Travel photography features
Sigma Quattro Travel photography features
74
weather sealing
provides touch to focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
screen is selfie friendly
terrible battery pack (310 CIPA)
55
environment proofing
amazing MP (29 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (625 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Landscape photography info
Sigma Quattro Landscape photography info
74
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
weather sealing
terrible battery pack (310 CIPA)
72
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3")
amazing MP (29MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
environment proofing
no image stabilization
missing Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Vlogging advice
Sigma Quattro Vlogging advice
82
screen is selfie friendly
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have external mic support
22
provides face detect focusing
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video resolution low ( pxls)
missing mic port
heavier than competition (625g)
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 II and Sigma Quattro
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IISigma sd Quattro
General Information
Brand Olympus Sigma
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Sigma sd Quattro
Class Advanced Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2015-02-06 2016-02-23
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VII Dual TRUE III
Sensor type MOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 29 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 5424 x 3616
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW files
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 81 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sigma SA
Available lenses 107 76
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 1,037 thousand dot 1,620 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot 2,360 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x 0.73x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/4000 secs
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 10.0 frames/s 3.8 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 -
Video format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 469 gr (1.03 lbs) 625 gr (1.38 lbs)
Dimensions 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 896 not tested
Other
Battery life 310 pictures -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLN-1 BP-61
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Retail price $699 $738