Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS200
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a426/9a4260754748d1d18e1d86724961ebe1d9136dca" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL8 front Olympus PEN E-PL8 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/408a9/408a9d2866582d16da93a6b808591f0e980025dc" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front"
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL7
- New Model is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Released February 2018
- Other Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus E-PL8 and Panasonic ZS200, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-PL8 (16MP) and the ZS200 (20MP) is pretty close but the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") possess totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-PL8 was launched 17 months before the ZS200 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-PL8 matches up against the ZS200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL8 & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Panasonic ZS200
E-PL8 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-PL8
ZS200 | E-PL8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | ![]() | September 2016 | Newer by 17 months |
Screen resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 1037k | Crisper screen (+203k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Panasonic ZS200
E-PL8 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL8 provides external measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") and a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS200 has specifications of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL8 and Panasonic ZS200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-PL8 vs the ZS200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96db8/96db88d4c673a611c1d826ad91d648fe32364510" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL8 and ZS200 is 86 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90b05/90b05fb991cae5e23716872171d376075d39618f" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specifications. The pic here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL8 and ZS200.
Plainly, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL8 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic ZS200 will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged E-PL8 will be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd49d/bd49ddf24336f5ae70b85e829aea58d89d9cf7db" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0bf9/f0bf90053436e3dc37eaf28a27de7c3cd94a7725" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2018-02-13 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 1,240k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 357 grams (0.79 pounds) | 340 grams (0.75 pounds) |
Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 370 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $500 | $800 |