Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A390
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87f98/87f9860bdd2f90e1ac1160944f3da7fb05966ce6" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc9a0/cc9a0ca2125609e674d299e5b8108d0775ff4eee" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front"
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Released February 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M5
- Later Model is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Released July 2010
- Previous Model is Sony A380
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A390 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-M5 II versus Sony A390, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the A390 (14MP) is pretty similar but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and A390 (APS-C) possess different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M5 II was introduced 4 years after the A390 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-M5 II matches up against the A390 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A390 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II and Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery and Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Sony A390
E-M5 II | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | ![]() | July 2010 | Newer by 56 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus E-M5 II
A390 | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Sony A390
E-M5 II | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 II provides exterior dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") along with a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Sony A390 has dimensions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M5 II versus Sony A390 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the E-M5 II vs the A390.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18ba3/18ba3a481e579940c92ad83f6678ccad33a4e794" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A390 size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A390 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 II and A390 is 80 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f624/3f624c9abaea6572a625b6c89dad3d18ae267f0b" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by going over a spec sheet. The pic underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 II and A390.
Clearly, both of those cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 II using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Olympus E-M5 II will offer greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 II provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1286/a12866adbb785a572bd2c6ace2a4d02f428dadc7" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca22b/ca22b329bbda948eceff565bbe901abe13472250" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A390 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2015-02-06 | 2010-07-28 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Bionz |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Number of lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 469 grams (1.03 lb) | 549 grams (1.21 lb) |
Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | 896 | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | 230 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $699 | $500 |