Clicky

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony HX300

Portability
80
Imaging
53
Features
84
Overall
65
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front
Portability
63
Imaging
44
Features
51
Overall
46

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony HX300 Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
  • Announced February 2015
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M5
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M5 III
Sony HX300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
  • Introduced February 2013
  • Replaced the Sony HX200V
  • Updated by Sony HX400V
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony HX300 Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony HX300, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the HX300 (20MP) is pretty well matched but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and HX300 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-M5 II was announced 24 months later than the HX300 which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-M5 II grades versus the HX300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Sony HX300

 E-M5 II HX300 
IntroducedFebruary 2015February 2013Fresher by 24 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k921kCrisper screen (+116k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus E-M5 II

 HX300 E-M5 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Sony HX300

 E-M5 II HX300 
Manual focus Very precise focus
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurements

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 II has got outside measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Sony HX300 has sizing of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony HX300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M5 II compared to the HX300.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony HX300 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 II and HX300 is 80 and 63 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing simply by looking at specifications. The photograph underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 II and HX300.

Plainly, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 II with its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Sony HX300 will give more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more modern E-M5 II will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Portrait photography info
Sony HX300 Portrait photography info
71
you can focus manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focus
saves RAW files
42
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Street photography information
Sony HX300 Street photography information
82
screen articulates
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
includes focus by touch
environment proofing
very good high ISO (25,600)
50
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
more heavy than others in class (623g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II as a Sports photography camera
Sony HX300 as a Sports photography camera
65
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet mode (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
environment proofing
bad battery (310 shots)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
55
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Travel photography highlights
Sony HX300 Travel photography highlights
74
environment proofing
includes focus by touch
MP count good (16 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
bad battery (310 per charge)
54
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1200mm)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than others in class (623g)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Landscape photography information
Sony HX300 Landscape photography information
74
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
environment proofing
bad battery (310 CIPA)
48
you can focus manually
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
no Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Vlogging info
Sony HX300 Vlogging info
82
selfie friendly display
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has mic port
25
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
no external microphone socket
more heavy than others in class (623 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony HX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 II and Sony HX300
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IISony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
Category Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2015-02-06 2013-02-20
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VII -
Sensor type MOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 5184 x 3888
Maximum native ISO 25600 12800
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW format
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 81 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.8-6.3
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dots 921 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/16000 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate 10.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash -
Flash settings Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual -
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 469 grams (1.03 lb) 623 grams (1.37 lb)
Physical dimensions 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 896 not tested
Other
Battery life 310 photographs -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model BLN-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $699 $339