Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony HX300
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Announced February 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M5
- Replacement is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Replaced the Sony HX200V
- Updated by Sony HX400V
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony HX300 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony HX300, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the HX300 (20MP) is pretty well matched but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and HX300 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M5 II was announced 24 months later than the HX300 which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-M5 II grades versus the HX300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Sony HX300
E-M5 II | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2015 | February 2013 | Fresher by 24 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 921k | Crisper screen (+116k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus E-M5 II
HX300 | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Sony HX300
E-M5 II | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 II has got outside measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Sony HX300 has sizing of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony HX300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M5 II compared to the HX300.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 II and HX300 is 80 and 63 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing simply by looking at specifications. The photograph underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 II and HX300.
Plainly, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 II with its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Sony HX300 will give more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more modern E-M5 II will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2015-02-06 | 2013-02-20 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-6.3 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 469 grams (1.03 lb) | 623 grams (1.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $699 | $339 |