Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony T900
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65


96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Released February 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M5
- Renewed by Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced February 2009

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony T900 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus E-M5 II and Sony T900, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and T900 (12MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.

The E-M5 II was brought out 6 years later than the T900 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-M5 II grades vs the T900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony T900 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Sony T900
E-M5 II | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | ![]() | February 2009 | More recent by 73 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 922k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-M5 II
T900 | E-M5 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Sony T900
E-M5 II | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 II enjoys physical measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") along with a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) and the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M5 II and Sony T900 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M5 II and the T900.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and T900 is 80 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements only by going over a spec sheet. The visual below may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 II and T900.
Clearly, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 II featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 II will offer you greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 II is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony T900 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2015-02-06 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 469g (1.03 lbs) | 143g (0.32 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $699 | $300 |