Clicky

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony T900

Portability
80
Imaging
53
Features
84
Overall
65
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front
Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
30
Overall
32

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony T900 Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
  • Released February 2015
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M5
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M5 III
Sony T900
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
  • Announced February 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony T900 Overview

Below, we will be comparing the Olympus E-M5 II and Sony T900, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and T900 (12MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The E-M5 II was brought out 6 years later than the T900 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-M5 II grades vs the T900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Sony T900

 E-M5 II T900 
AnnouncedFebruary 2015February 2009More recent by 73 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k922kClearer screen (+115k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-M5 II

 T900 E-M5 II 
Screen dimension3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Sony T900

 E-M5 II T900 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 II enjoys physical measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") along with a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) and the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M5 II and Sony T900 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M5 II and the T900.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony T900 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and T900 is 80 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements only by going over a spec sheet. The visual below may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 II and T900.

Clearly, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 II featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 II will offer you greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 II is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Portrait photography factors
Sony T900 Portrait photography factors
71
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
27
manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II as a Street photography camera
Sony T900 as a Street photography camera
82
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
has touch focus
weather proof
good high ISO (25,600)
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Sports photography details
Sony T900 Sports photography details
65
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/16,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
weather proof
not so great battery life (310 per charge)
has no phase detect auto focus
24
built in image stabilization (Optical)
low max shutter speed (1/1,000 seconds)
low fps (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Travel photography highlights
Sony T900 Travel photography highlights
74
weather proof
has touch focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
not so great battery life (310 shots)
51
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse function
low MP (12 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Landscape photography information
Sony T900 Landscape photography information
74
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
weather proof
not so great battery life (310 per charge)
36
manual focus
big screen (3.5 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M5 II
Vlogging with Sony T900
82
selfie friendly display
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has external mic jack
28
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony T900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 II and Sony T900
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IISony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
Category Advanced Mirrorless Ultracompact
Released 2015-02-06 2009-02-17
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VII -
Sensor type MOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW pictures
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 81 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 35-140mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-10.0
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3.5 inch
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dot 922 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 2s
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/1000s
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shutter speed 10.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 469g (1.03 lbs) 143g (0.32 lbs)
Dimensions 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 896 not tested
Other
Battery life 310 photographs -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLN-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $699 $300