Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony WX80
Portability
80 Imaging
54 Features
84 Overall
66
80 Imaging
54 Features
84 Overall
66
Portability
96 Imaging
40 Features
38 Overall
39
96 Imaging
40 Features
38 Overall
39
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony WX80 Key Specs
Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Launched February 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M5
- Replacement is Olympus E-M5 III
Sony WX80
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-8.0) lens
- 124g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony WX80 Overview
Below is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-M5 II and Sony WX80, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the WX80 (16MP) is pretty comparable but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and WX80 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M5 II was launched 2 years later than the WX80 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony WX80 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-M5 II scores versus the WX80 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony WX80 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Sony WX80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Sony WX80
| E-M5 II | WX80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 26 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX80 over the Olympus E-M5 II
| WX80 | E-M5 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Sony WX80
| E-M5 II | WX80 |
|---|
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony WX80 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 II offers exterior dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") along with a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) and the Sony WX80 has measurements of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M5 II and Sony WX80 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M5 II against the WX80.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 II and WX80 is 80 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony WX80 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements simply by going through specifications. The visual underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 II and WX80.
Plainly, both of the cameras posses the exact same MP albeit not the same sensor measurements. The E-M5 II provides the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF simpler. The fresher E-M5 II is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony WX80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II Portrait photography highlights
Sony WX80 Portrait photography highlights
focusing manually
MP count good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focusing
saves RAW files
good megapixels (16MP)
features face detection focusing
no manual focus
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II Street photography features
Sony WX80 Street photography features
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
offers touch focus
environment proofing
above average high ISO (25,600)
image stabilization (Optical)
has touch focus
lighter than average in class (124 grams)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus E-M5 II
Sports photography with Sony WX80
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet mode (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proofing
low battery (310 CIPA)
lack of phase detect AF
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus E-M5 II
Travel photography with Sony WX80
environment proofing
offers touch focus
MP count good (16MP)
selfie friendly screen
low battery (310 shots)
lighter than average in class (124g)
has touch focus
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II as a Landscape photography camera
Sony WX80 as a Landscape photography camera
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
above average high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
environment proofing
low battery (310 per charge)
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual mode not available
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II Vlogging details
Sony WX80 Vlogging details
selfie friendly screen
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
includes external mic socket
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average in class (124 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
does not have a selfie friendly display
lack of external microphone socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony WX80 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2015-02-06 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 81 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-8.0 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 469g (1.03 pounds) | 124g (0.27 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 896 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLN-1 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $699 | $276 |
