Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A99
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
57 Imaging
68 Features
88 Overall
76
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Announced February 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M5
- Replacement is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 812g - 147 x 111 x 78mm
- Introduced December 2012
- Superseded the Sony A900
- Renewed by Sony A99 II
Photography Glossary Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A99 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M5 II versus Sony A99, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and A99 (24MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and A99 (Full frame) boast totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M5 II was released 2 years after the A99 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A99 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-M5 II scores against the A99 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A99 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Sony SLT-A99. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Sony A99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Sony A99
| E-M5 II | A99 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 | December 2012 | Newer by 27 months | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A99 over the Olympus E-M5 II
| A99 | E-M5 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1229k | 1037k | Crisper screen (+192k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Sony A99
| E-M5 II | A99 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A99 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 II comes with outside dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Sony A99 has specifications of 147mm x 111mm x 78mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 3.1") having a weight of 812 grams (1.79 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M5 II versus Sony A99 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M5 II versus the A99.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and A99 is 80 and 57 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A99 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions only by checking out a spec sheet. The pic underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 II and A99.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 II due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony A99 will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The more modern E-M5 II is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A99 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A99 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sony SLT-A99 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sony SLT-A99 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2015-02-06 | 2012-12-12 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz |
| Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 852.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 81 | 19 |
| Cross focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 1,229k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 2,359k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.71x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 469 gr (1.03 lbs) | 812 gr (1.79 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 147 x 111 x 78mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 73 | 89 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | 25.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | 14.0 |
| DXO Low light score | 896 | 1555 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 pictures | 500 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLN-1 | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo; SD, SDHC and SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | Two |
| Cost at launch | $699 | $1,998 |