Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus E-PM2
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Introduced October 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Replacement is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched May 2013
- Replaced the Olympus E-PM1
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
The following is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-M5 III versus Olympus E-PM2, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both produced by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M5 III was manufactured 6 years after the E-PM2 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-M5 III scores against the E-PM2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III and Olympus PEN E-PM2. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery and Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Olympus E-PM2
E-M5 III | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2019 | May 2013 | Newer by 78 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Sharper screen (+580k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus E-M5 III
E-PM2 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus E-PM2
E-M5 III | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 III offers exterior measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PM2 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M5 III versus Olympus E-PM2 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M5 III vs the E-PM2.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and E-PM2 is 80 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specs. The pic underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 III and E-PM2.
All in all, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Olympus E-M5 III to deliver greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 III should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-10-17 | 2013-05-21 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414 gr (0.91 lbs) | 269 gr (0.59 lbs) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 932 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 images | 360 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $1,199 | $448 |