Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c365/2c36512778594cdfbf2b2301f5cdebbcaebbc0db" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Revealed October 2019
- Replaced the Olympus E-M5 II
- Refreshed by OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Launched January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M5 III was announced 10 years later than the SP-565UZ and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-M5 III matches up against the SP-565UZ in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Olympus SP-565UZ. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Olympus SP-565UZ
E-M5 III | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2019 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 131 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-M5 III
SP-565UZ | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus SP-565UZ
E-M5 III | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 III comes with outer dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Olympus SP-565UZ has measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M5 III vs the SP-565UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3180/b318029ecb03abbdb2cd5588fcadf2c155370d29" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and SP-565UZ is 80 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5212b/5212bc4b5669215d815147909a319c13942eadfd" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing just by going over specifications. The photograph underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 III and SP-565UZ.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 III using its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 III will offer extra detail with its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 III is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7bea/d7bea5cf6267cf17871f7cf5e9189cc05d8ae022" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82db0/82db0d58fd0ab70201846263192d061ed58e24d9" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2019-10-17 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414 gr (0.91 pounds) | 413 gr (0.91 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 30 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $1,199 | $400 |