Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-2
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c365/2c36512778594cdfbf2b2301f5cdebbcaebbc0db" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac7d4/ac7d4b646d82f72e1235bc9a541f3ccc1d146b3c" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-2 front Olympus Stylus SH-2 front"
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Launched October 2019
- Superseded the Olympus E-M5 II
- Replacement is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced March 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus SH-1
- Replacement is Olympus SH-3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus SH-2, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are offered by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and SH-2 (16MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and SH-2 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M5 III was brought out 4 years later than the SH-2 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-M5 III grades versus the SH-2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III and Olympus Stylus SH-2. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery and Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Olympus SH-2
E-M5 III | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2019 | ![]() | March 2015 | More recent by 57 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+580k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus E-M5 III
SH-2 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus SH-2
E-M5 III | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 III offers outer dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-2 has proportions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus SH-2 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M5 III versus the SH-2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/559b5/559b5db1a0c509c1dfdfb19f9da86a01b278c880" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and SH-2 is 80 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71f78/71f78e2e5f04e85bde5424d30aeb1bd8717705a1" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at technical specs. The visual here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 III and SH-2.
As you have seen, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 III because of its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M5 III will resolve extra detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The younger E-M5 III is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f189/5f1891146a0e5a04f7ac98251a75dedc39154f98" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9fc1a/9fc1a302a72cbeac91d36a2f03592f7f20909171" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2019-10-17 | 2015-03-11 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 30.0fps | 11.5fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414 grams (0.91 lb) | 271 grams (0.60 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | 380 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $1,199 | $399 |