Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-3
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c365/2c36512778594cdfbf2b2301f5cdebbcaebbc0db" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba681/ba6812b6e5df39af8b55dc812608daf65a0563e5" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-3 front Olympus Stylus SH-3 front"
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Revealed October 2019
- Old Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Later Model is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-3, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are built by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and SH-3 (16MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and SH-3 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M5 III was introduced 3 years after the SH-3 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-M5 III matches up vs the SH-3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Olympus Stylus SH-3. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Olympus SH-3
E-M5 III | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2019 | ![]() | February 2016 | Newer by 45 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+580k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus E-M5 III
SH-3 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus SH-3
E-M5 III | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 III comes with exterior dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-3 has dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M5 III vs the SH-3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3f55/f3f5580be5ed1f2a5576f6ac58cb8de6bf32b497" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-3 size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-3 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and SH-3 is 80 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc817/fc817ecf819e90608b848316607cf5899fda8482" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions only by checking specs. The image below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 III and SH-3.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 III using its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 III will give you more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The more modern E-M5 III will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3208f/3208f301c5d5529997d04c4cf3c4f7dd0c917ddb" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72204/722049ccc27be27775f61a3c7f9245ae8f6eba73" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2019-10-17 | 2016-02-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames/s | 11.5 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414 grams (0.91 lb) | 271 grams (0.60 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | 380 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $1,199 | $579 |