Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus Tough-3000
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c365/2c36512778594cdfbf2b2301f5cdebbcaebbc0db" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Introduced October 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Renewed by OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Below is a extensive review of the Olympus E-M5 III versus Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both are offered by Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-M5 III was brought out 9 years later than the Tough-3000 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-M5 III scores vs the Tough-3000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Olympus Tough-3000
E-M5 III | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2019 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 119 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-M5 III
Tough-3000 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus Tough-3000
E-M5 III | Tough-3000 |
---|
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 III has got external dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus Tough-3000 has measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M5 III versus Olympus Tough-3000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M5 III and the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d03ee/d03ee76aafc4e6d9f6179594dab81305107a6e13" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 III and Tough-3000 is 80 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44eb2/44eb29d0d26f0b4aa71b6cf95d4b6dce1aa821e4" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements just by looking through technical specs. The visual underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 III and Tough-3000.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 III because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 III will result in more detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The newer E-M5 III should have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb502/bb50228872422b10920268a6d8e78f8367caf0f3" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ec38/5ec385661e63b7cc38c5580dfd58a2aff2bd9bf6" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Also called as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2019-10-17 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414 grams (0.91 lb) | 159 grams (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $1,199 | $0 |