Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c365/2c36512778594cdfbf2b2301f5cdebbcaebbc0db" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90636/906367f78182e973de499b537fdc76fa3fafdc16" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Revealed October 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Renewed by OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both are produced by Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M5 III was manufactured 5 years after the TG-850 iHS which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-M5 III grades versus the TG-850 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-M5 III | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2019 | ![]() | January 2014 | More modern by 70 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus E-M5 III
TG-850 iHS | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-M5 III | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 III comes with external measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Olympus TG-850 iHS has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M5 III versus the TG-850 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3229d/3229d442dd234d1b12c7b61338980b59b5901a59" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 III and TG-850 iHS is 80 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05a26/05a26dcc923c5ba977b1cc74ee3075e52ac12afc" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at specs. The pic here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 III and TG-850 iHS.
All in all, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 III due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M5 III will resolve greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 III will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b9f8/8b9f88feb0eea16b09b1b01743538cc155a32284" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c06d/7c06d7f53886644cf8d4ed5445234a191e106d94" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2019-10-17 | 2014-01-29 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4616 x 3464 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1/2 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Yes |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414 gr (0.91 lb) | 218 gr (0.48 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photographs | 330 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $1,199 | $250 |