Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-320
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Announced October 2019
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Refreshed by OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus TG-320, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and TG-320 (14MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and TG-320 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M5 III was brought out 7 years after the TG-320 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-M5 III matches up against the TG-320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Olympus TG-320. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Olympus TG-320
E-M5 III | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2019 | January 2012 | Newer by 95 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus E-M5 III
TG-320 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus TG-320
E-M5 III | TG-320 |
---|
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 III features outer measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus TG-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M5 III against the TG-320.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and TG-320 is 80 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions just by viewing technical specs. The image below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 III and TG-320.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 III because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M5 III will provide you with greater detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 III should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus TG-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus TG-320 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2019-10-17 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414g (0.91 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | 150 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $1,199 | $0 |