Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Launched October 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M5 II
- Successor is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and they are both offered by Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M5 III was unveiled 6 years later than the TG-2 iHS and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M5 III scores against the TG-2 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III and Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery and Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-M5 III | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2019 | June 2013 | Fresher by 77 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 610k | Sharper display (+430k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M5 III
TG-2 iHS | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-M5 III | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 III has got physical measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has sizing of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M5 III and the TG-2 iHS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and TG-2 iHS is 80 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing purely by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 III and TG-2 iHS.
Clearly, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 III using its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M5 III will render more detail having an extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The more modern E-M5 III provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2019-10-17 | 2013-06-28 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414 grams (0.91 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | 350 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $1,199 | $380 |