Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FH25
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
94 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FH25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Revealed October 2019
- Replaced the Olympus E-M5 II
- Replacement is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Launched January 2011
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FS35
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FH25 Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FH25, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and FH25 (16MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and FH25 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M5 III was manufactured 8 years after the FH25 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FH25 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-M5 III grades vs the FH25 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FH25 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Panasonic FH25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Panasonic FH25
E-M5 III | FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2019 | January 2011 | Newer by 107 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH25 over the Olympus E-M5 III
FH25 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Panasonic FH25
E-M5 III | FH25 |
---|
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FH25 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 III offers exterior measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Panasonic FH25 has proportions of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FH25 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M5 III versus the FH25.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and FH25 is 80 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FH25 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions only by researching specs. The pic underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 III and FH25.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 III due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M5 III will result in greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 III should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FH25 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FS35 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2019-10-17 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine VI |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 30.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720p (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414g (0.91 lbs) | 159g (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | 250 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $1,199 | $180 |