Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c365/2c36512778594cdfbf2b2301f5cdebbcaebbc0db" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a092/2a092ddc3a33aceaaaea152b15c17049a1980cec" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 front"
55 Imaging
51 Features
80 Overall
62
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Introduced October 2019
- Replaced the Olympus E-M5 II
- Later Model is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Revealed June 2014
- Updated by Panasonic FZ2500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M5 III (20MP) and the FZ1000 (20MP) is fairly well matched but the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and FZ1000 (1") enjoy totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M5 III was introduced 5 years after the FZ1000 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-M5 III grades against the FZ1000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Panasonic FZ1000
E-M5 III | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2019 | ![]() | June 2014 | More modern by 66 months |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 921k | Crisper display (+119k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus E-M5 III
FZ1000 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Panasonic FZ1000
E-M5 III | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 III features outside dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ1000 has measurements of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") accompanied by a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M5 III and the FZ1000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/383ae/383ae51d4c3f167d8b599dbd51fc82d3dfef0508" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and FZ1000 is 80 and 55 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba2c2/ba2c2e00d0c52045c4b915a3efe50bdfb3093d95" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to see the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at specs. The image below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 III and FZ1000.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact MP but not the same sensor sizes. The E-M5 III features the larger sensor which should make getting shallower DOF less difficult. The fresher E-M5 III is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0868/d0868d0a8c8543a867d0c8af9f3e12948a68bb1d" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6dc18/6dc18c7612df654c31c8753815bb9b6ad02dddd7" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2019-10-17 | 2014-06-12 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414 grams (0.91 lbs) | 831 grams (1.83 lbs) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 shots | 360 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $1,199 | $800 |