Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic TS3
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
92 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic TS3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Released October 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Replacement is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 197g - 103 x 64 x 27mm
- Released August 2011
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FT3
- Succeeded the Panasonic TS2
- Replacement is Panasonic TS4
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic TS3 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic TS3, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and TS3 (12MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and TS3 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M5 III was unveiled 8 years later than the TS3 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic TS3 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-M5 III scores against the TS3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic TS3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Panasonic TS3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Panasonic TS3
E-M5 III | TS3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2019 | August 2011 | Fresher by 100 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS3 over the Olympus E-M5 III
TS3 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Panasonic TS3
E-M5 III | TS3 |
---|
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic TS3 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 III provides physical measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Panasonic TS3 has proportions of 103mm x 64mm x 27mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 197 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic TS3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the E-M5 III against the TS3.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and TS3 is 80 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic TS3 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by going over a spec sheet. The graphic here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 III and TS3.
Clearly, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 III having a bigger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M5 III will deliver greater detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The newer E-M5 III will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic TS3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic TS3 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-FT3 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2019-10-17 | 2011-08-16 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1300 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414 gr (0.91 lb) | 197 gr (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 103 x 64 x 27mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photographs | 310 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $1,199 | $380 |