Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic ZS35
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Announced October 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Renewed by OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Introduced January 2014
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS30
- Renewed by Panasonic ZS40
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic ZS35, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M5 III was launched 5 years later than the ZS35 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-M5 III matches up versus the ZS35 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Panasonic ZS35
E-M5 III | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2019 | January 2014 | Fresher by 71 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-M5 III
ZS35 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Panasonic ZS35
E-M5 III | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 III has external measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS35 has proportions of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic ZS35 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the E-M5 III versus the ZS35.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and ZS35 is 80 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing only by looking through a spec sheet. The visual here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 III and ZS35.
As you can see, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 III featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M5 III will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-M5 III is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2019-10-17 | 2014-01-06 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414g (0.91 pounds) | 305g (0.67 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $1,199 | $300 |