Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax Efina
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c365/2c36512778594cdfbf2b2301f5cdebbcaebbc0db" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9615f/9615f14033973fe3fd8e2ebaf4a8743724f7b918" alt="Pentax Efina front Pentax Efina front"
97 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax Efina Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Launched October 2019
- Older Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Newer Model is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 91g - 87 x 54 x 21mm
- Revealed June 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax Efina Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax Efina, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and Efina (14MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and Efina (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M5 III was manufactured 6 years later than the Efina and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax Efina being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-M5 III matches up versus the Efina in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax Efina Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Pentax Efina. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Pentax Efina Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Pentax Efina
E-M5 III | Efina | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2019 | ![]() | June 2013 | Fresher by 78 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Efina over the Olympus E-M5 III
Efina | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Pentax Efina
E-M5 III | Efina |
---|
Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax Efina Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 III enjoys physical dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Pentax Efina has measurements of 87mm x 54mm x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 91 grams (0.20 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax Efina in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M5 III against the Efina.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d3dd/4d3dd5a0b364b0febfb652e8584c34d8a6c5f163" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax Efina size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax Efina size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and Efina is 80 and 97 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c8bb/6c8bb84442e4302e7f921dd97de22e32b70418f2" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax Efina top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax Efina top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax Efina Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by reading technical specs. The visual here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 III and Efina.
As you have seen, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 III due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M5 III will offer you extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The newer E-M5 III should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55d0f/55d0f80ec5d1e208348ad869b08ab263410f6ff8" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax Efina sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax Efina sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax Efina Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c999e/c999ee3d021787b8f68762c7735b6ce75f3ac5dc" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax Efina Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax Efina Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax Efina Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Pentax Efina | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Pentax Efina |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2019-10-17 | 2013-06-03 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | - | 20cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 1/8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1400s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 30.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414 gr (0.91 lb) | 91 gr (0.20 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 87 x 54 x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photographs | 200 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | D-LI109 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $1,199 | $10 |