Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Introduced October 2019
- Older Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Replacement is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Released August 2011
Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Overview
The following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-M5 III and Pentax WG-1 GPS, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and WG-1 GPS (14MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and WG-1 GPS (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M5 III was announced 8 years after the WG-1 GPS which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-1 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-M5 III grades against the WG-1 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
E-M5 III | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2019 | August 2011 | Newer by 100 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Olympus E-M5 III
WG-1 GPS | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Pentax WG-1 GPS
E-M5 III | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 III provides outer dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Pentax WG-1 GPS has dimensions of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M5 III and Pentax WG-1 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M5 III and the WG-1 GPS.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and WG-1 GPS is 80 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specs. The pic below might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 III and WG-1 GPS.
All in all, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 III using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 III will result in more detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The newer E-M5 III should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2019-10-17 | 2011-08-16 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414 gr (0.91 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photographs | 260 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $1,199 | $350 |