Clicky

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR

Portability
80
Imaging
61
Features
88
Overall
71
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front
 
Ricoh GR front
Portability
90
Imaging
57
Features
54
Overall
55

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
  • Released October 2019
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M5 II
  • Updated by OM System OM-5
Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Launched April 2013
  • Refreshed by Ricoh GR II
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR Overview

Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M5 III and Ricoh GR, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and GR (16MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and GR (APS-C) provide different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M5 III was introduced 6 years later than the GR and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-M5 III grades vs the GR with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Ricoh GR

 E-M5 III GR 
LaunchedOctober 2019April 2013More recent by 80 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus E-M5 III

 GR E-M5 III 
Screen resolution1230k1040kClearer screen (+190k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Ricoh GR

 E-M5 III GR 
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to lug around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 III has external measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Ricoh GR has proportions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M5 III and Ricoh GR in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-M5 III versus the GR.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 III and GR is 80 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing specs. The photograph here may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 III and GR.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 III having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus E-M5 III will result in extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The newer E-M5 III provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GR as a Portrait photography camera
76
has manual focus
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
features face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
74
has manual focus
flash sync speed is above average (1/4,000 seconds)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Street photography highlights
Ricoh GR Street photography highlights
83
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
supports touch focus
environment sealing
very good ISO range (25,600)
74
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than average in class (245 grams)
great ISO range (25,600)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Sports photography details
Ricoh GR Sports photography details
75
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
high frames per second (30.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
features tracking focus
environment sealing
supports phase detect autofocus
terrible battery power (310 per charge)
45
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
can't change focal length (28mm)
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M5 III
Travel photography with Ricoh GR
77
environment sealing
connects via bluetooth
supports touch focus
megapixel count good (20MP)
selfie friendly screen
terrible battery power (310 per charge)
71
lighter than average in class (245g)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
does not offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Landscape photography factors
Ricoh GR Landscape photography factors
77
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
terrible battery power (310 shots)
61
has manual focus
screen size is decent (3 inches)
MP count decent (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
great ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Vlogging info
Ricoh GR Vlogging info
84
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detect autofocus
good video quality (4096 x 2160 pixels)
comes with microphone port
30
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average in class (245 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have microphone support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 III and Ricoh GR
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IIIRicoh GR
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M5 III Ricoh GR
Type Advanced Mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Released 2019-10-17 2013-04-17
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type MOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 4928 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 25600 25600
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Minimum enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 121 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28mm (1x)
Max aperture - f/2.8
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,040 thousand dots 1,230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Optical (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 300s
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/4000s
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shutter rate 30.0fps 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 5.40 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250s 1/4000s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 414g (0.91 lb) 245g (0.54 lb)
Physical dimensions 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 78
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 972
Other
Battery life 310 photos 290 photos
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLN-1 DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD, SDHC, SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at release $1,199 $971