Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71


90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Released October 2019
- Replaced the Olympus E-M5 II
- Updated by OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Launched April 2013
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR II

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M5 III and Ricoh GR, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and GR (16MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and GR (APS-C) provide different sensor sizing.

The E-M5 III was introduced 6 years later than the GR and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-M5 III grades vs the GR with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Ricoh GR. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Ricoh GR
E-M5 III | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2019 | ![]() | April 2013 | More recent by 80 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus E-M5 III
GR | E-M5 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 1040k | Clearer screen (+190k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Ricoh GR
E-M5 III | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 III has external measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Ricoh GR has proportions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M5 III and Ricoh GR in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-M5 III versus the GR.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 III and GR is 80 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing specs. The photograph here may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 III and GR.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 III having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus E-M5 III will result in extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The newer E-M5 III provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Ricoh GR |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2019-10-17 | 2013-04-17 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 300s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 30.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414g (0.91 lb) | 245g (0.54 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | 290 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $1,199 | $971 |