Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR II
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71


89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Revealed October 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- New Model is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Revealed June 2015
- Replaced the Ricoh GR

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR II Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Olympus E-M5 III and Ricoh GR II, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and GR II (16MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and GR II (APS-C) use totally different sensor size.

The E-M5 III was introduced 4 years later than the GR II and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-M5 III grades versus the GR II in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR II Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Ricoh GR II. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Ricoh GR II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Ricoh GR II
E-M5 III | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2019 | ![]() | June 2015 | More recent by 53 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Olympus E-M5 III
GR II | E-M5 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 1040k | Sharper screen (+190k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Ricoh GR II
E-M5 III | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 III comes with external measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Ricoh GR II has dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M5 III and Ricoh GR II in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M5 III vs the GR II.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and GR II is 80 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements just by going through specifications. The visual underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 III and GR II.
Plainly, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 III having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus E-M5 III will provide greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The newer E-M5 III will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GR II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Ricoh GR II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Ricoh GR II |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2019-10-17 | 2015-06-17 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | GR Engine V |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-16.0 |
Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 300 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414g (0.91 lbs) | 251g (0.55 lbs) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1078 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photographs | 320 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $1,199 | $599 |