Clicky

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh WG-4

Portability
80
Imaging
61
Features
88
Overall
71
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front
 
Ricoh WG-4 front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
  • Launched October 2019
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M5 II
  • Later Model is OM System OM-5
Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Introduced February 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-M5 III versus Ricoh WG-4, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and WG-4 (16MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and WG-4 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-M5 III was manufactured 5 years later than the WG-4 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-M5 III scores against the WG-4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Ricoh WG-4

 E-M5 III WG-4 
IntroducedOctober 2019February 2014More recent by 70 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1040k460kSharper screen (+580k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus E-M5 III

 WG-4 E-M5 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Ricoh WG-4

 E-M5 III WG-4 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 III has got outer measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M5 III versus Ricoh WG-4 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M5 III versus the WG-4.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh WG-4 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and WG-4 is 80 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh WG-4 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 III and WG-4.

Clearly, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 III due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 III will deliver more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The newer E-M5 III will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh WG-4 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 as a Portrait photography camera
76
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
41
focusing manually
good resolution (16MP)
includes face detection focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M5 III
Street photography with Ricoh WG-4
83
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
supports touch focus
weather proof
good ISO range (25,600)
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Sports photography factors
Ricoh WG-4 Sports photography factors
75
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/32,000s)
high frames per second (30.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather proof
supports phase detect AF
not so great battery life (310 per charge)
45
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
weather proofing
max fps very slow (2.0 frames per second)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery life (240 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Travel photography advice
Ricoh WG-4 Travel photography advice
77
weather proof
has bluetooth
supports touch focus
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
not so great battery life (310 shots)
72
weather proofing
good resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
bad battery life (240 shots)
does not feature selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Landscape photography factors
Ricoh WG-4 Landscape photography factors
77
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
weather proof
not so great battery life (310 CIPA)
54
focusing manually
quite wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
weather proofing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
bad battery life (240 CIPA)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Vlogging information
Ricoh WG-4 Vlogging information
84
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detection focusing
high res video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
comes with external mic jack
36
quite wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
doesn't have external mic port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 III and Ricoh WG-4
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IIIRicoh WG-4
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M5 III Ricoh WG-4
Class Advanced Mirrorless Waterproof
Launched 2019-10-17 2014-02-05
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII -
Sensor type MOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 125
RAW photos
Minimum enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Display resolution 1,040 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/4000 secs
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shutter speed 30.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 10.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 414 grams (0.91 lb) 230 grams (0.51 lb)
Physical dimensions 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 310 shots 240 shots
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLN-1 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $1,199 $330