Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh WG-4
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71


90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Launched October 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M5 II
- Later Model is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-M5 III versus Ricoh WG-4, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and WG-4 (16MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and WG-4 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.

The E-M5 III was manufactured 5 years later than the WG-4 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-M5 III scores against the WG-4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III and Ricoh WG-4. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Ricoh WG-4
E-M5 III | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2019 | ![]() | February 2014 | More recent by 70 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+580k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus E-M5 III
WG-4 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Ricoh WG-4
E-M5 III | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 III has got outer measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M5 III versus Ricoh WG-4 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M5 III versus the WG-4.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and WG-4 is 80 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 III and WG-4.
Clearly, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 III due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 III will deliver more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The newer E-M5 III will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Ricoh WG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Ricoh WG-4 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2019-10-17 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414 grams (0.91 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 shots | 240 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $1,199 | $330 |