Clicky

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung DV150F

Portability
80
Imaging
60
Features
88
Overall
71
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front
 
Samsung DV150F front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
29
Overall
35

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung DV150F Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
  • Revealed October 2019
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M5 II
  • Renewed by OM System OM-5
Samsung DV150F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
  • 116g - 96 x 55 x 18mm
  • Launched January 2013
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung DV150F Overview

Below, we are matching up the Olympus E-M5 III versus Samsung DV150F, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and DV150F (16MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and DV150F (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The E-M5 III was manufactured 6 years later than the DV150F and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung DV150F being a Compact camera.

Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-M5 III scores against the DV150F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Samsung DV150F

 E-M5 III DV150F 
LaunchedOctober 2019January 2013More recent by 83 months
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1040k460kSharper display (+580k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Samsung DV150F over the Olympus E-M5 III

 DV150F E-M5 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Samsung DV150F

 E-M5 III DV150F 
Touch display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung DV150F Physical Comparison

When you are intending to lug around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 III provides physical dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Samsung DV150F has proportions of 96mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M5 III versus Samsung DV150F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M5 III and the DV150F.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung DV150F size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 III and DV150F is 80 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung DV150F top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung DV150F Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements merely by looking through technical specs. The visual here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 III and DV150F.

As you have seen, both cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 III because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M5 III will result in greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 III provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung DV150F sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung DV150F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung DV150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M5 III
Portrait photography with Samsung DV150F
76
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detection focusing
saves RAW files
34
MP count good (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focusing
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Street photography advice
Samsung DV150F Street photography advice
83
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
has focus by touch
weather sealing
very good ISO range (25,600)
56
lighter than competition in class (116g)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Sports photography advice
Samsung DV150F Sports photography advice
75
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
silent shutter (1/32,000s)
high fps (30.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
weather sealing
has phase detect AF
terrible battery (310 per charge)
36
MP count good (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III as a Travel photography camera
Samsung DV150F as a Travel photography camera
77
weather sealing
has bluetooth
has focus by touch
megapixel count decent (20MP)
selfie friendly screen
terrible battery (310 per charge)
69
lighter than competition in class (116 grams)
MP count good (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (25mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Landscape photography factors
Samsung DV150F Landscape photography factors
77
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
weather sealing
terrible battery (310 shots)
34
relatively wide (25mm)
MP count good (16MP)
no manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Vlogging advice
Samsung DV150F Vlogging advice
84
selfie friendly screen
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection focusing
video res high (4096 x 2160 pixels)
has external mic port
31
relatively wide (25mm)
built-in touchscreen
supports face detection focusing
lighter than competition in class (116 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung DV150F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 III and Samsung DV150F
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IIISamsung DV150F
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M5 III Samsung DV150F
Type Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2019-10-17 2013-01-07
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type MOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW data
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 121 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-125mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.5-6.3
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 1,040 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech - Rear TFT LCD + 1.5 inch front LCd
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 30.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash -
Flash modes Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 414 grams (0.91 lb) 116 grams (0.26 lb)
Dimensions 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") 96 x 55 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 310 images -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLN-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $1,199 $150