Clicky

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ10W

Portability
80
Imaging
61
Features
88
Overall
71
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front
 
Samsung HZ10W front
Portability
90
Imaging
32
Features
27
Overall
30

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
  • Launched October 2019
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M5 II
  • Updated by OM System OM-5
Samsung HZ10W
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
  • 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
  • Released May 2009
  • Other Name is WB500
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ10W Overview

In this article, we are looking at the Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ10W, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and HZ10W (10MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and HZ10W (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-M5 III was introduced 10 years after the HZ10W which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ10W being a Compact camera.

Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-M5 III matches up versus the HZ10W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Samsung HZ10W

 E-M5 III HZ10W 
ReleasedOctober 2019May 2009Newer by 127 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1040k230kClearer display (+810k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Olympus E-M5 III

 HZ10W E-M5 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Samsung HZ10W

 E-M5 III HZ10W 
Manually focus More accurate focus

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 III comes with physical measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Samsung HZ10W has sizing of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ10W in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the E-M5 III against the HZ10W.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ10W size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and HZ10W is 80 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ10W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions only by going through a spec sheet. The pic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 III and HZ10W.

As you can see, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 III with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 III will produce extra detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern E-M5 III should have a benefit in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ10W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M5 III
Portrait photography with Samsung HZ10W
76
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detect focus
supports RAW files
30
focusing manually
comes with face detection focusing
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Street photography advice
Samsung HZ10W Street photography advice
83
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
has focus by touch
weather sealing
very good high ISO (25,600)
52
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
more heavy than competition (249 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Sports photography info
Samsung HZ10W Sports photography info
75
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent shooting (1/32,000s)
high max fps (30.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking focus
weather sealing
has phase detect auto focus
bad battery pack (310 CIPA)
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M5 III
Travel photography with Samsung HZ10W
77
weather sealing
supports bluetooth
has focus by touch
megapixel count decent (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
bad battery pack (310 shots)
53
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (249g)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung HZ10W as a Landscape photography camera
77
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
weather sealing
bad battery pack (310 CIPA)
35
focusing manually
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen is small (2.7")
lack of manual mode
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
does not have Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Vlogging features
Samsung HZ10W Vlogging features
84
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detect focus
video res high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
has mic port
28
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone port
more heavy than competition (249g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 III and Samsung HZ10W
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IIISamsung HZ10W
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus OM-D E-M5 III Samsung HZ10W
Also referred to as - WB500
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2019-10-17 2009-05-14
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII -
Sensor type MOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 3648 x 2432
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW support
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-240mm (10.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.3-5.8
Macro focus range - 5cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 1,040 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 16 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 30.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash -
Flash settings Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 414 grams (0.91 pounds) 249 grams (0.55 pounds)
Dimensions 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 310 images -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model BLN-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $1,199 $300