Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ10W
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
90 Imaging
32 Features
27 Overall
30
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Launched October 2019
- Superseded the Olympus E-M5 II
- Updated by OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released May 2009
- Other Name is WB500
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
In this article, we are looking at the Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ10W, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and HZ10W (10MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and HZ10W (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M5 III was introduced 10 years after the HZ10W which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ10W being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-M5 III matches up versus the HZ10W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III and Samsung HZ10W. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery and Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Samsung HZ10W
| E-M5 III | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | October 2019 | May 2009 | Newer by 127 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Olympus E-M5 III
| HZ10W | E-M5 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Samsung HZ10W
| E-M5 III | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focus |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 III comes with physical measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Samsung HZ10W has sizing of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ10W in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the E-M5 III against the HZ10W.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and HZ10W is 80 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions only by going through a spec sheet. The pic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 III and HZ10W.
As you can see, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 III with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 III will produce extra detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern E-M5 III should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Samsung HZ10W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Samsung HZ10W |
| Also referred to as | - | WB500 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2019-10-17 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2432 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 414 grams (0.91 pounds) | 249 grams (0.55 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $1,199 | $300 |