Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ25W
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71


70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Revealed October 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M5 II
- Replacement is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Released July 2010
- Alternate Name is WB5000

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M5 III versus Samsung HZ25W, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and HZ25W (12MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and HZ25W (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.

The E-M5 III was manufactured 9 years later than the HZ25W and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ25W being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-M5 III matches up versus the HZ25W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Samsung HZ25W. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Samsung HZ25W
E-M5 III | HZ25W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2019 | ![]() | July 2010 | More recent by 113 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Olympus E-M5 III
HZ25W | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Samsung HZ25W
E-M5 III | HZ25W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera, you should factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 III enjoys physical measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Samsung HZ25W has specifications of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M5 III versus Samsung HZ25W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M5 III versus the HZ25W.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and HZ25W is 80 and 70 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to visualise the difference in sensor measurements just by viewing specs. The graphic here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 III and HZ25W.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 III due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 III will render more detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 III will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Samsung HZ25W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Samsung HZ25W |
Otherwise known as | - | WB5000 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2019-10-17 | 2010-07-06 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 16s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414 gr (0.91 lbs) | 428 gr (0.94 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $1,199 | $350 |