Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung TL320
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Launched October 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M5 II
- Renewed by OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternative Name is WB1000
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M5 III and Samsung TL320, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and TL320 (12MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and TL320 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M5 III was announced 10 years after the TL320 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-M5 III grades vs the TL320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Samsung TL320. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Samsung TL320
E-M5 III | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2019 | February 2009 | More modern by 130 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Olympus E-M5 III
TL320 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Samsung TL320
E-M5 III | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 III comes with outside dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Samsung TL320 has measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M5 III and Samsung TL320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-M5 III against the TL320.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and TL320 is 80 and 98 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by checking out specifications. The image underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 III and TL320.
To sum up, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 III using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M5 III will provide more detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 III should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Samsung TL320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Samsung TL320 |
Otherwise known as | - | WB1000 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2019-10-17 | 2009-02-23 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414g (0.91 lb) | - |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $1,199 | $380 |