Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung WB250F
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Launched October 2019
- Superseded the Olympus E-M5 II
- Refreshed by OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung WB250F Overview
In this article, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung WB250F, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and WB250F (14MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and WB250F (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M5 III was announced 6 years after the WB250F which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-M5 III scores vs the WB250F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III and Samsung WB250F. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery and Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Samsung WB250F
E-M5 III | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2019 | January 2013 | More modern by 83 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Olympus E-M5 III
WB250F | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Samsung WB250F
E-M5 III | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 III provides outer dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has proportions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung WB250F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M5 III against the WB250F.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and WB250F is 80 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching specs. The image underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 III and WB250F.
All in all, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 III with its larger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 III will provide you with greater detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The newer E-M5 III will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Samsung WB250F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Samsung WB250F |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2019-10-17 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 30.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414g (0.91 pounds) | 226g (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $1,199 | $250 |